Questions For Evolutionists

     If Creationism is merely religion and not real science because it involves faith, and if the theory of evolution is genuine science, then what scientific evidence is there to support the theory of evolution that does not have to be accepted by faith?

Have you ever read a book or magazine that teaches or promotes evolution and took note of how heavily the theory of evolution relies on logic fallacies and mathematical absurdities?

What is the origin of the first matter?

What is the hard evidence that any rock, stratum, or fossil is millions and not thousands of years old?

How do you reconcile the theory of evolution with the DNA Code Barrier, Gene Depletion, Natural Selection, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics? How can the theory of evolution be considered scientific when the DNA Code Barrier, Gene Depletion, Natural Selection, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics make the theory of evolution scientifically impossible? (The DNA Code Barrier is a principle that demonstrates that one kind of creature only has genetic information to produce its own kind, while evolution says that it is possible to produce a new kind of animal or plant. Gene Depletion is the principle that mutations are caused by the loss or sorting of the genetic data of the parents, in other words depletion and not improvement of the gene pool. Natural Selection removes the genetically weaker mutant thus preserving the gene pool and preventing change, while evolution says the mutant can cause a different kind of animal or plant to be produced. The Second Law of Thermodynamics holds that under normal conditions all systems left on their own tend to become disordered, corrupted, and dispersed over time while evolution says disordered, dispersed, and lifeless atoms and molecules come together spontaneously over time to form complex molecules and structures.)

What scientific evidence is there that a chance combination or mixture of chemicals can produce a living organism?

How can a mutation result in a change from one species into another since mutations take away from a genetic code but never add to it?

How did single-celled creatures make the jump to multi-celled forms and is there any fossil record of this? (When you ask this, you can expect evolutionists to insist that single-celled forms did make the jump to multi-celled forms, but the question is "How" and not "Did" or "If.")

 

 

For more information visit:

Creation Today https://creationtoday.org/

Institute For Creation Research https://www.icr.org/

Creation Ministries International https://creation.com/

Tornado in a junkyard : the relentless myth of Darwinism, by James Perloff https://archive.org/details/tornadoinjunkyar00perl

If Creationism is merely religion and not real science because it involves faith, and if the theory of evolution is genuine science, then what scientific evidence is there to support the theory of evolution that does not have to be accepted by faith?

Have you ever read a book or magazine that teaches or promotes evolution and took note of how heavily the theory of evolution relies on logic fallacies and mathematical absurdities?

What is the origin of the first matter?

What is the hard evidence that any rock, stratum, or fossil is millions and not thousands of years old?

How do you reconcile the theory of evolution with the DNA Code Barrier, Gene Depletion, Natural Selection, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics? How can the theory of evolution be considered scientific when the DNA Code Barrier, Gene Depletion, Natural Selection, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics make the theory of evolution scientifically impossible? (The DNA Code Barrier is a principle that demonstrates that one kind of creature only has genetic information to produce its own kind, while evolution says that it is possible to produce a new kind of animal or plant. Gene Depletion is the principle that mutations are caused by the loss or sorting of the genetic data of the parents, in other words depletion and not improvement of the gene pool. Natural Selection removes the genetically weaker mutant thus preserving the gene pool and preventing change, while evolution says the mutant can cause a different kind of animal or plant to be produced. The Second Law of Thermodynamics holds that under normal conditions all systems left on their own tend to become disordered, corrupted, and dispersed over time while evolution says disordered, dispersed, and lifeless atoms and molecules come together spontaneously over time to form complex molecules and structures.)

What scientific evidence is there that a chance combination or mixture of chemicals can produce a living organism?

How can a mutation result in a change from one species into another since mutations take away from a genetic code but never add to it?

How did single-celled creatures make the jump to multi-celled forms and is there any fossil record of this? (When you ask this, you can expect evolutionists to insist that single-celled forms did make the jump to multi-celled forms, but the question is "How" and not "Did" or "If.")

 

 

For more information visit:

Creation Today https://creationtoday.org/

Institute For Creation Research https://www.icr.org/

Creation Ministries International https://creation.com/

Tornado in a junkyard : the relentless myth of Darwinism, by James Perloff https://archive.org/details/tornadoinjunkyar00perl