Sex in modern music is
not the real issue, the problem is the portrayal or description. In decades
past parents had concerns about the sensuality in the music of Frank Sinatra,
Elvis Presley, and The Beatles, but at least those musicians did sing about
love, affection, tenderness, and commitment, which is preferable to the cold
and demeaning (and sometimes violent or sadistic) sensuality pervading modern
music.
Sex and violence in
modern movies and TV is not the problem, the problem is the portrayal. Many
classic movies and TV shows had as much (or more) sex and violence as modern
movies and TV shows, but the portrayal was different. For example, in
"Gone With The Wind," when Rhett Butler picked up Scarlett O’Hara and
carried her up the stairs most knew what was about to happen next and the scene
about the morning after made it obvious what had happened the night before, but
a child in the audience too young and innocent to understand wouldn’t figure it
out based on what was shown. Many classic war movies showed a lot of violence
without violence for the mere sake of violence. (Incidentally, these were
examples of how Christian influence can and did change things for the better.
In the 1920s songs with sexually explicit lyrics were broadcast over radio
during the day, and regular movie houses showed movies which featured
immorality and full nudity, and some that portrayed homosexuality as
acceptable, and a six-year-old with the price of admission was legally free to
watch. What happened? In short, Christians took a stand and required standards.
Later, in 1939 “Gone With The Wind” was almost considered too risqué to be
allowed in regular theatres because of one bad word and a scene in which a
husband picked up his wife and carried her upstairs to their bedroom. Think
about it.)
It wasn't that long ago
that a woman could breastfeed her baby in public without stigma or negative
reactions, but pornography was not readily available. Today pornography is
readily available on Main Street, at the gas station, on TV, and on the
internet, while many think a mother should be ashamed to feed her baby as God
designed because they don't know the difference between a mother nursing her
baby and a harlot exposing herself. In the 1940s and `50s teenagers smoked
cigarettes, but at the same time unwed pregnancy was disgraceful, abortion was
an abomination and a crime, and homosexuality was a sexual perversion. Today we
segregate smokers and put a sin tax on cigarettes, unwed pregnancy is not
viewed as a social malady while teenage pregnancy is considered a crisis, in
some States abortion is protected as a legal right, and homosexuality is
considered a preference, an alternate lifestyle, and a civil right. (I am not
condoning tobacco, just illustrating how our priorities and values have
changed.)
What happened? In the
ecclesiastical world Bible truths and standards were disregarded or rejected as
irrelevant and old-fashioned and as the ecclesiastical world compromised Bible
truths and principles the secular world followed. As Christians compromised
truths and values to gain the love or acceptance of the world they lost respect
and influence.
While it may not be
intended as such, it can be taken as complimentary when someone says you are
old-fashioned because of your beliefs and values: While trends and technology
change continually, truth does not, and the truth will inevitably be considered
old or old-fashioned. (Psalm 33:10-11; Proverbs 19:21; Ecclesiastes 1:9-10;
James 1:17)
It is amazing how so many
professed Christians so readily accept an unscriptural or anti-biblical
teaching or theory as truth merely because it is considered new or modern or is
endorsed by the world and how easily they dismiss a Bible teaching or standard
as wrong or irrelevant if it is considered old-fashioned or unpopular.
(Consider Proverbs 2:6; 3:5-7; Isaiah 55:8-9; Jeremiah 6:10, 16, 19; Romans
12:2; Colossians 2:8) The Bible provides guidance in every area of human
existence and applying Bible teachings benefits both believers and unbelievers;
the important difference is that for the unbeliever the Word of God is
convicting and for the believer the Word of God is cleansing. While specific
rules of necessity require periodic alterations and additional rules because of
differing cultures and changing technology, the Bible teaches truths and
principles that apply to every generation and culture. (Psalm 33:4, 10-11;
119:89, 152; Ecclesiastes 1:9-10; II Timothy 3:16)
Many dismiss the Old
Testament as irrelevant, which is a mistake. It is not possible to understand
the New Testament without the Old Testament. For example, suppose a pastor were
caught in the sex act with an animal and the church decided to dismiss him
because a pastor must be blameless. What would be the charge? Fornication is
clearly condemned in the New Testament but the English word fornication, and
the Greek word porneia which is rendered fornication in the English text,
simply means sexual immorality. How can bestiality and other immoral sex acts
be identified as immoral using only the New Testament? Without the Old
Testament the word fornication becomes vague and indistinct. Insisting that the
Old Testament is irrelevant and that we only need the New Testament encourages
and reinforces myths and heresies.
Do Old Testament laws
have any relevance today? Yes. The laws are based on truths and principles, and
while the application of the truths and principles may change those truths and
principles are eternal. The Law awakened conscience and disciplined moral faculties.
The ancient Israelites were like an heir being trained and prepared with a view
toward adoption. (Galatians 4:1-5) Just as the head of a household must set
standards for his family, God set standards to preserve His truths and
principles, protect His people from evil influences, and distinguish them from
the heathen; also, the Law, God's standards of righteousness, made the sinful
carnal adamic nature manifest, thus showing the need for redemption and a
redeemer. (Psalm 119:142; Romans 3:20; 3:31; 5:20; 7:7; Galatians 3:19, 24; I
Timothy 1:9) The Law will always stand as God's standards of righteousness but
the Law itself had no saving power. (Romans 3:31; 7:12; I Timothy 1:8; Psalm
119:142) Everyone is obligated to obey God. (Ecclesiastes 12:13-14) The Bible
does not teach equality of sins; this can be seen in the differences in the
severity of penalties prescribed in the Old Testament. However, one sin or
violation of one law is sufficient to make one guilty before God and break
fellowship with God. (James 2:10) How many sins did Adam & Eve have to
commit to be expelled from Paradise? (One.) Everyone will be judged by works.
(John 5:28-29; Revelation 20:11-13) But good deeds, good works, or right living
cannot and will not save anyone. (Isaiah 64:6; II Corinthians 5:17-21;
Ephesians 2:8-9) Teaching God's holy law (standards of righteousness) is
needful so that fallen men can see themselves as sinners in need of a savior.
The Law served to manifest the sinful nature, man's depravity, and to pronounce
everyone guilty before God and thus demonstrate the need for redemption and a
mediator. (Romans 3:19-20; 7:7, 12-14; 8:3-4; Galatians 3:19, 24; I Timothy
1:9-11; Hebrews 7:19)
While the New Testament
teaches a different application of grace, the New Testament echoes the truths
taught in the Old Testament, reaffirms the moral principles or standards of the
Old Testament, and you cannot understand the New Testament without the Old
Testament. (Consider Acts 24:14; Romans 3:31; II Timothy 2:15; 3:16) For example,
salvation has always been through blood, starting with the blood that was shed
for Adam and Eve: Making a coat of skin required the slaughter of an animal.
(Genesis 3:21) Abel sacrificed animals while Cain offered the product or fruit
of his labors, and Abel's offering was respected. (Genesis 4:3-5; incidentally,
Genesis 4 gives the first account of a liberal attacking a conservative.) The
blood of animals prefigured the blood of Christ. Old Testament saints looked
forward to the Cross and New Testament saints look back to the Cross. (Hebrews
10:1-12)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.