Sunday, July 6, 2025

THE INFLUENCE OF EVOLUTION ON RACE RELATIONS IN THE SOUTH & THE FAILURE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT

 


Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution to perpetuate the superiority or inferiority of various ethnic groups. The original title of his 1959 book was "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."

Modernism as a religious movement in the South, which emerged around 1870, included acceptance of the theory of evolution.

Jim Crow Laws, which were established between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the mid-20th century, were rooted in Social Darwinism and were results of the growing popularity and acceptance of theistic evolution and atheistic evolution in the late 19th century and the 20th century. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries the main reasons or arguments used to justify and support Jim Crow Laws were the belief that blacks are less evolved than whites and thus inferior, and the stereotype that all black people are sexually irresponsible or hypersexual.

Obvious counters to this are the Bible teachings on creationism and the danger of negative stereotyping, which were neglected or ignored during the Civil Rights Movement, which focused on symptoms while neglecting to deal with root causes and taught reliance on the centralization and expansion of US government power as a solution to problems that were largely results of US government intrusion. You cannot change hearts through legislation or court orders, and this fostered resentment and racial polarization and was often highly impractical. For example, forced integration cost billions of dollars that the States and the US government did not have (extra buses, extra fuel, extra drivers, etc.) and fostered a we-vs-they mentality among both blacks and whites. In the meantime, the theory of evolution, which was the root of the problem, was still being taught in schools and colleges as fact and endorsed by clergy and churches claiming to stand for civil rights.

Incidentally, the efforts of social engineers to change hearts through legislation and court orders tend to be self-defeating, and a closer look will also reveal that leftist policies and programs often hindered, directly or indirectly, the promised “progress.” For example, in the early 1950s, before coerced racial integration and egalitarianism, various businesses (e.g., coffeehouses, etc.) in Birmingham, Alabama, and Atlanta, Georgia, and other southern cities took down “White Only” signs because of realization that being open to everyone could mean more money and would not hurt anything. This and other factors make me question the actual motives of the Left on this issue. (I am hoping to encourage you to do further research.)

 

Further reading:

Did the Civil Rights Movement Fail?

QUESTIONS FOR EVOLUTIONISTS


Tornado in a Junkyard: The Relentless Myth of Darwinism, by James Perloff, examines the scientific evidence refuting the theory of evolution.

Tornado in a junkyard : the relentless myth of Darwinism

 




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

THE DEMONISATION OF THE SOUTH AND CONFEDERATE SYMBOLS

   “History is not there for you to like or dislike it is there for you to learn from it and if it offends you even better because you are l...